The government should not allow Harisu, a transgender, to adopt a child

The original Korean text: https://blog.naver.com/stevision/50025506792

 

>> I don't think the word transgender is a word that represents some substantial thing, because sex change is impossible, and because the word gender-change forms an ideology that destroys the society by defending homosexuality. I use the words such as transgender and gender-change here not because I acknowledge their substantial meanings but merely for convenience and because of language convention. <<

 

According to generally accepted view, it is absolutely unacceptable to have sex reassignment surgery or for a man to marry a transgender (who used to be a man). And I think the transgender couple did what they shouldn't have done for their parents.

 

Individual self-indulgence and selfishness must stop at that line. However, rumor has it that transgender Harisu (who used to be a man), who have married a man, wants to adopt children. The government should never allow this. Children may have poor judgment, so may be willing to live in a home of such a transgender couple. Or some children may be too young, so that they got unilaterally adopted to a transgender couple. But consider how they will grow. Have you ever thought about the pain these children will go through while going to school when they have abnormal parents? What if the teacher says, "Bring your mother with you"? The child having a transgender mother would be greatly hurt. And there will be a fatal damage to the identity of the adopted ones when they have grown up. Who will compensate them for this? When the adopted ones reach a marriageable age, who would want to marry the adopted ones of a transgender couple or marry to the house of the transgender couple, to call, for example, Harisu their mother-in-law? Can you describe the pain of the adoptees in this family then?

 

Harisu, let's say you had sex change surgery because you look a little like a woman. Nevertheless you should have known about yourself and shouldn't have got married, considering the pain of your man's parents. It's an extremely selfish idea. And do you think the children others gave birth to can be pet animals for you? Are they pets you can raise for fun? Why do you not think about their suffering and human rights when they grow up? Why are you a total egoist? Please think of others! If you had had a normal personality, you would never have thought of marriage or of adoption of children. If you felt sorry for the children unselfishly, you can support them with money through third persons secretly; because you're thinking wrong now. Of course, even in this case, you have to throughly hide yourself from the children, for the good of them.

 

Please, consider others' position!

 

The government should never allow homosexuals or transsexuals to adopt children, considering the children's human rights. It's a betrayal against the people.